Posts Tagged GMO

The Beautiful Truth! :0)

I know some of you have been questioning the scientific validity of what I have found and know with every essence of my being to be truth. I have just completed watching a profoundly validating movie that will vibrantly transform your life for the better if you allow it to.

I have watched it on netflix, but have done a search and have found it available at all major video stores. Blockbuster, Movie Gallery, Hollywood Video, etc..

Watch the trailers here->>> http://thebeautifultruthmovie.com/

Watch the movie with your loved ones and spread the truth far and wide.

Wishing for you Vibrant Health,

Cathi :0)

Leave a Comment

The Conscious Eater’s Guide to GMOs

Choosing to eat a healthy diet can be a challenge, especially when it comes to sorting out the controversies surrounding genetically engineered foods. Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), were first grown commercially in the United States in 1996. Now, the Center for Food Safety reports that GMOs can be found in about 75 percent of the processed foods sold in our local supermarkets.

Worldwide, GMO crops are grown on about 280 million acres, almost entirely in corn and soybeans grown for animal feed, industrial chemicals and plant-based fuels. The main thing to know about GMOs is that they are made by the chemical industry, for the chemical industry, and sold to farmers for weed and pest control.

We now eat GMOs in our breakfast cereals and corn chips because in the United States the industrial agriculture system mixes crops from many sources during production and manufacturing. GMOs are now in just about anything made with corn, soy or canola, as well as oil from cottonseed. Most of the meat, eggs and dairy products we eat come from animals fed GMOs. The only fresh GMO food being sold right now is a mushy papaya from Hawaii; the GMO spud was a dud and other fresh GMOs have failed in the marketplace.

How GMOs Came to Market

GMOs were developed by large agrochemical multinational corporations like Monsanto, Dow, DuPont, Sygenta and Bayer. These companies are not known for their commitment to public health and environmental safety. They continue to lobby against government regulations and work to undermine the public research system. As a result, they have been able to put GMOs on the market without appropriate health and environmental testing and safety measures.

As part of their marketing strategy, the GMO industry also has kept labels off their products in the United States, even though the Center for Food Safety reports that polls repeatedly show that up to 94 percent of Americans want labels on GMO foods. Most other industrial countries label GMOs, and many tightly restrict their testing and use.

The industry, made up of corporations, their paid lobbyists and academic allies, claim that GMOs are safe. The industry says they don’t know of any health harm proven to be caused by their products. But their position is not backed by reliable research from independent scientists. There is no government testing; whatever information the government gets from industry is on a voluntary basis.

And there are ethical issues, especially for people with health-based or religious dietary restrictions. Everyone needs to know what’s in their food. But GMOs are unlike anything the world has seen before. They combine genes from different species. For example, genetic engineers have inserted genes from an arctic fish into strawberries, to make them frost tolerant, but not something a vegan would want to eat.

Genetic engineering is also known as recombinant DNA technology, because it takes DNA from one organism and combines it with DNA from another organism. It does what nature avoids, crossing the natural boundaries between species. GMOs are new, living organisms, capable of spreading, reproducing and recombining. Their presence is invisible and irreversible.


What We Don’t Know Can Hurt Us

The processes used to create GMOs are not precise or predictable. What is precise is the first step, selecting and engineering the DNA to be used. After that, genes are engineered and recombined with bacteria, viruses, and other designer molecules, then often put into a ‘gene gun’ and shot into living cells.

The result can create new proteins that might trigger serious allergic
reactions or recombine with other bacteria and viruses to create new pathogens or toxins. The antibiotic resistant marker gene used in the process could render the antibiotics we use to control disease less effective.

Reports based on animal studies indicate that both the process and products of genetic engineering are causing problems. Animals fed GMOs exclusively had more false pregnancies and a greater mortality rate than control groups. Researchers also have evidence of impaired blood cell formation, liver problems, excessive growths in the digestive tract and adverse immune reactions.

One thing is certain—GMOs are an uncontrolled human experiment. A leading pediatric neurologist at Harvard Medical School, Dr. Martha R. Herbert, says:  “Today, the vast majority of foods in supermarkets contain genetically modified substances whose effects on our health are unknown. As a medical doctor, I can assure you that no one in the medical profession would attempt to perform experiments on human subjects without their consent. Such conduct is illegal and unethical. Yet, manufacturers of genetically altered foods are exposing us to one of the largest uncontrolled experiments in modern history.”

In terms of nutrition, as early as 1992, scientists at the Food and Drug Administration warned that GMOs could cause “undesirable alteration in the level of nutrients” in foods. Later, one study found that GMO soybeans repeatedly sprayed with herbicides had 12 to 14 percent less essential phytonutrient content than conventionally grown soybeans.

Here’s why scientists think GMOs are different: when plants are forced to do something as stressful as having to stay alive while being repeatedly sprayed with a lethal herbicide, they make tradeoffs during the growth cycle. One tradeoff might be diminished nutrient content; another might be in the plant’s ability to produce seed, which would affect productivity. More than 8,000 field trials and numerous studies have shown that herbicide-resistant soybeans are 6 to 11 percent less productive than conventional varieties.

The Politics of Food

The facts about GMOs reveal that they are not more productive than conventional crops and they are not better for people. Still, many consumers and farmers believe the advertising that says GMOs can feed the world.

Unfortunately, the public does not get reliable information about GMOs. That’s because, even before GMOs went on the market, government regulators made a political decision, not one based on science, that they would treat GMO foods the same as natural foods. It also was decided that no new laws would be passed to oversee this industry. This ineffective regulatory system is causing even greater concern now because pending products, such as GMO animals, fish and insects, and plants that are engineered with human genes and pharmaceuticals, are coming on the market or have already contaminated farm fields and the food supply.

Public interest groups and independent scientists have documented the problems caused by GMOs, reporting, for instance, that GMOs have increased the use of herbicides, thereby increasing soil and water pollution.

Research has shown that GMO insecticidal corn harms monarch butterflies and other beneficial insects. Weeds growing near GMO farms have become ‘superweeds,’ which don’t die when sprayed with weed killers. GMOs have spread their unnatural DNA into forests and grasslands and contaminated the crops grown by organic farmers. Today, even conventional seeds are laden with GMOs, so that farmers who want to plant conventional crops are unintentionally growing GMOs. GMO contamination also has caused serious legal problems for farmers and had an impact on U.S. farm exports.

The persistent problems of hunger and poverty in countries around the world are caused by political and economic inequalities. It will take political action, not a techno-fix, to remedy these problems. Farmers need support, but not in the form of patented products like GMOs.

International studies show that farmers want easy-to-use tools, locally bred and adapted seed, clean water and healthy soil. The technology that is needed would produce healthy food while protecting the environment and providing a means for farmers to support themselves and their communities. Fortunately, that technology already exists. It’s called organic farming.

The good news is that consumers can avoid GMOs by choosing organic foods. By law, certified organic products are not allowed to contain GMOs. Making this choice also supports sustainable farming and ensures the nutritional quality of food, free of synthetic chemicals.

We can support local farmers by buying more fresh food from them. We also can grow food ourselves. Even keeping a pot of herbs or salad greens near a sunny window is a delicious reminder that our food comes from nature, not corporate farm factories.

Growing and sharing food builds community relationships and reconnects us to the land. All that is needed to create an economy of abundance are many small acts of generosity. It’s what nature does for us, every day.

Claire Hope Cummings is a lawyer, journalist, and expert on agriculture and genetic engineering. She has farmed in California and Vietnam, was an attorney with the U.S. Department of Agriculture for four years, and is the author of the primary source for this article, Uncertain Peril: Genetic Engineering and the Future of Seeds (Beacon Press, 2008.)

RECOMMENDED RESOURCES:

Organic Consumers Association –
www.OrganicConsumers.org

Center for Food Safety –
www.CenterForFoodSafety.org

Watch out for cloning & irradiation

Source:  naturalawakeningsmag.com
by Claire Hope Cummings
Issue: November 2008

Leave a Comment

Cows don’t drink cow’s milk, so why do humans?

I look around and my heart breaks, seeing the alarming increased rate in obesity, disease and cardiovascular problems in young children and adults. Through my time as a colonhydrotherapist and my experimentation in my own body, I believe that dairy products are one of the main contributors to these deadly life draining diseases.   I do miss the delicious taste of cheese, but if it will rob me of precious energy and a fruitful life, I will pass on the cheese and other dairy products thank you.  I personally have learned to make sprouted (soaked and rinsed) sesame, almond, hemp, pumpkin milks and cheeses to name a few of the possibilities that abound with nuts and seeds.  Sesame milk made at home is easy, inexpensive and has the highest easily absorbable amount of calcium that I have found including protein, other minerals, vitamins B&E, and healthy utilizable fat that gets used not stored in the body.  Almond and hemp milks also have similar benefits mainly a great easily digestible protein source.  Pumpkin seeds have protein, Vitamin E,  phosphorus, iron, zinc.  Milks can also be made from sprouted oat, rye and wheat berries.  I personally enjoy the taste of almond, oat and sesame milks the best.  Fresh young coconut milk is also very delicious using the water and the meat.

Here is an excerpt from one of my most valuable books.. no matter what diet you live on, vegan, vegitarian or S.A.D (standard american diet) this is a book everyone would HIGHLY benefit from reading in so many ways…

“Cows don’t drink cow’s milk, so why do humans?  What in the world are humans doing drinking cow’s milk?  If a grown cow was offered milk, it would sniff it and say, “No, thanks, I’ll have the grass.”  Think about it.  Could our creator possibly have set things up in such a way that the only species on earth to drink cow’s milk would be human beings?  Perhaps you are thinking to yourself, “what’s he thinking about, calves drink cow’s milk!”  Exactly!  Cow’s milk was designed and created for one purpose and one purpose only: to feed the young of the species.  No animals drink or want to drink milk once they are weaned.  Of course, I’m not talking about domesticated animals, who have been perverted from their natural inclinations. During the initial phase of life it is the invariable practice of all mammals to take the milk of their mothers; then they are weaned and spend the remainder of their lives sustained by other foods.  Nature dictates that we are to be weaned at an early age.  Humans, on the other hand, teach that after a mother has performed her nursing, the cow should take over.  In other words, there is one mammal on earth that should never, ever be weaned: humans!  Why?  Of course, it is difficult to look at the issue objectively, because of all the contradictory information that abounds, but isn’t your sense of logic and your common sense a bit offended by the idea that humans should never be weaned?

Have you ever seen a zebra nursing off a giraffe?  No?  Have you ever seen a dog nursing off a horse?  No? Well, have you ever seen a human nursing off a cow?  All three examples are equally ridiculous.  But you have seen humans nursing off cows, because if you have ever seen anyone drinking milk or eating any other kind of dairy product, you have seen it.  Just because someone milks the cow and gets it to the consumer in a clean glass doesn’t mean that person is not nursing from a cow.  Of course, it doesn’t seem strange at all to see someone drinking a glass of milk, but what would your reaction be if you were driving down a country lane and you happened to look over into the pastures to see a well-dressed man or woman down on his or her knees, suckling from a cow?  Would you make your way through the droppings and go right up to a cow and take the milk directly from her udder?  No?  But you will let someone else get it and bring it to you in a glass, right?  Of course, I’m being facetious, but it seems funny only because people’s logic, instincts and common sense would stop them from drinking milk if it were not supplied for them.

The facts are clear about one thing: The chemical composition of cow’s milk is different from that of human’s milk.  If your insides could talk after you ingested a dairy product, they would ask, “What’s this person doing  hanging around cows?”

The enzymes necessary to break down and digest milk are renin and lactase.  They are all but gone by the age of three in most humans.  There is an element in all milk known as casein.  There is three hundred times more casein in cow’s milk than in human’s milk.  That’s for the development of huge bones.   Casein coagulates in the stomach and forms large, tough, dense, difficult-to-digest curds that are adapted to the four-stomach digestive apparatus of a cow.  Once inside the human system, this mass of goo puts a tremendous burden on the body to somehow get rid of it.  In other words, a huge amount of energy must be spent in dealing with it.  Unfortunately some of this gooey substance hardens and adheres to the lining of the intestines and prevents the absorption of the nutrients into the body.  Result: lethargy. Also the by-products of milk digestion leave a great deal of toxic mucus in the body.  It’s very acidic, and some of it is stored in the body until it can be dealt with at a later time.  The next time you are going to dust your home, smear some paste all over everything and see how easy it is to dust.  Dairy products do the same to the inside of your body.  That translates into more weight instead of weight loss.  Casein, by the way, is the base of one of the strongest glues used in woodworking.”

Resource: Fit For Life by Harvey and Marilyn Diamond

These are just some of the detrimental effects cows milk and by-products have on the body.  There is the whole other subject of pasteurizing killing the live enzymes giving your body virtually no chance of digesting the milk, as well as hormones, antibiotics, and genetically modified corn to feed the cows, all of these ending up in the milk as well.  Hormones bulking and morphing our bodies as they do the cows, antibiotics weakening our immune systems and creating more powerful bacteria that are not phased by antibiotics, and GMO frakenfood need I say more?

I have tried soy milk from the stores and found it to be very acidic, congesting and mucus forming, and I also learned after I had tried it that soy is one of the most GMO foods sold in stores today.  Any milks bought in stores that are pasteurized have killed all living enzymes that I have found within my own body to be crucial for proper digestion.  It really is very simple to make my own seed and nut milks at home mixed with raw agave or stevia I really have grown quite fond of these live, digestible, nutritious milks.  Even though I always prefer homemade over pasteurized and processed, if I was unable to make my own seed or nut milk at home I would go for the store bought Oat, Almond, Rice, or Coconut Milks.  Even the Rice or Coconut Milk ice creams they have out now are delicious as well.  I find the store bought coconut milk and ice cream to digest best on an empty stomach and wait a few hours before eating anything else, Rice Dream I have no problems with.  I will always choose these over cow’s milk from now on!

This post is based on my opinion from my own extensive research through books and online resources, as well as the effects on my body through my own experimentation.

Comments (1)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.